Skip to main content
· 7/25/2003

United States v. Panfil

Citations

  • 338 F.3d 1299
  • 2003 WL 21715880

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting an argument that the statute fails to provide fair notice of illegal conduct because the terms have plain, ordinary meanings, and observing that the “scienter requirement discourages ‘unscrupulous enforcement’”
  • “[Section 2422(b)’s] scienter requirement discourages ‘unscrupulous enforcement’ and clarifies § 2422(b).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Cox, Magill, Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.