Podracky v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• assuming without deciding that the appellant had standing to assert a constitutional challenge in order to decide the case on the best and narrowest ground available
• approving this approach where a constitutional challenge did not have merit
• “[A]n appellate court decides cases ‘on the best and narrowest grounds available.’” (quoting Luginbyhl v. Commonwealth, 48 Va. App. 58, 64, 628 S.E.2d 74, 77 (2006))
• rejecting a First Amendment overbreadth challenge to then-Code § 18.2-374.3(B)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).