Skip to main content
· 11/22/2011

United States v. Paneto

Citations

  • 661 F.3d 709
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 23325
  • 2011 WL 5840268

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the commentary clarified the term \in connection with\ under Guidelines § 2K2.1
  • reciting facts as supportably found by ' the district court when defendant did not challenge the district court's factual findings
  • officers had probable cause to seize a $20 bill, which was evidence of a crime, despite not being able to confirm the incriminatory nature of the bill until after the officer picked it up, turned it over, and observed the incriminating mark
  • firearm and cocaine in \same small single-floor apartment\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lipez, Selya, Howard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.