Skip to main content

McAbee v. Chapman

Citations

  • 504 S.W.3d 18
  • 2016 Ky. LEXIS 629
  • 2016 WL 7655521

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a violation of Rule 615 is a “non-constitutional error[]”
  • applying abuse of discretion to the trial court’s failure to sequester expert witnesses
  • “Even experts offering opinions based 4 on the facts of the particular case will usually have access to those facts—via depositions, documents (such as medical records), or hypothetical questions— without being present for the testimony of other witnesses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hughes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.