United States v. Ness
Citations
- 245 U.S. 319
- 38 S. Ct. 118
- 62 L. Ed. 321
- 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1743
Syllabus
<p>The filing of a certificate of arrival, as provided in § 4, subdivision 2, of the Naturalization Act, is an essential prerequisite to a valid order of naturalization.</p> <p>The court of naturalization having assumed to dispense with this requirement upon proof of reasons why the certificate of arrival could not be obtained, held, that the certificate of naturalization was subject to be set'aside, in a suit by the United States under § 15 of the act, as a certificate “illegally procured.”</p> <p>Sections 11 and 15 of the Naturalization Act afford cumulative protection against fraudulent or illegal naturalization. In a suit under the latter to set aside a certificate granted in disregard of an essential requirement of the statute, the United States is not estopped by the order of naturalization, although, pursuant to the former section, it entered its appearance in the naturalization proceedings and there unsuccessfully raised the same objection.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- which was not mentioned in the opinion of the Circuit Court of Appeals just referred to
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brandeis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
98 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Schneiderman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1943-10-11· cited 695×
- Glidden Co. v. ZdanokSupreme Court· 1962-06-25· cited 689×
- Fedorenko v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1981-01-21· cited 518×
- Baumgartner v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1944-06-12· cited 372×
- Tutun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1926-04-12· cited 252×
- Knauer v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-10-14· cited 195×
- Beeler v. American Trust Co.California Supreme Court· 1944-04-03· cited 141×
- Rogers v. BelleiSupreme Court· 1971-04-05· cited 92×
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Liudas Kairys, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeSeventh Circuit· 1986-01-27· cited 91×
- Polites v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-11-21· cited 73×
- Maney v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1928-10-22· cited 65×
- Bindczyck v. FinucaneSupreme Court· 1951-11-26· cited 46×
- In Re: Petition for Naturalization of Charles Peter Duncan. Charles Peter Duncan v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1983-08-19· cited 30×
- Schurmann v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1920-05-03· cited 25×
- United States v. Umberto Anastasio, Also Known as Albert AnastasiaThird Circuit· 1955-11-16· cited 23×
- United States v. Paul De LuciaSeventh Circuit· 1958-06-18· cited 20×
- United States v. DercaczE.D. New York· 1982-02-02· cited 20×
- United States v. WexlerE.D. New York· 1925-10-15· cited 20×
- United States v. FedorenkoS.D. Florida· 1978-07-25· cited 17×
- United States v. RichmondThird Circuit· 1927-01-13· cited 17×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Other cases named United States v. Ness
7 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- United States v. NessUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1962-04-06· cited 42×
- United States v. NessEighth Circuit· 1916-02-16· cited 14×
- United States v. NessSecond Circuit· 2009-05-08· cited 12×
- United States v. NessSecond Circuit· 2006-10-10· cited 10×
- United States v. NessN.D. Iowa· 1914-10-17· cited 5×
- United States v. NessTenth Circuit· 2024-12-31· cited 2×
- United States v. NessNinth Circuit· 2007-01-16
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.