Johannessen v. United States
Citations
- 225 U.S. 227
- 32 S. Ct. 613
- 56 L. Ed. 1066
- 1912 U.S. LEXIS 2082
Syllabus
<p>Prior decisions of this court holding that a judgment of a competent court admitting a person to citizenship is, like every other judgment, competent evidence of its own validity, go no further than protecting the judgment from collateral attack.</p> <p>Congress may authorize direct proceedings to attack certificates of citizenship on the ground of fraud and illegality; and § 15>of the act of June 29, 1906, 34 Stat. 596, 601, c. 3592,, providing for such cases, is a valid exercise of the power of Congress under Art. I, § 8 of the Constitution of the United States.</p> <p>The foundation of the doctrine of res judicata or estoppel by judgment is that both parties have had their day in court, Southern Pacific R. R. Co. v. United States, 168 U. S. 1, 48; and where, a certificate of naturalization was issued without the Government appearing there is no estoppel against it, nor is such a certificate conclusive against the public.</p> <p>Certificates of naturalization, like patents for land or inventions, when issued ex parte can be annulled for fraud.</p> <p>How the judicial review of a certificate of naturalization should be conducted rests in legislative 'discretion.</p> <p>Quaere as to the conclusive effect of a certificate of naturalization issued after appearance and cross-examination by the Government.</p> <p>Quaere: Whether, in the absence of statute such as the act of June 29, 1906, a court of equity could set aside, or restrain the use of, a certificate of naturalization.</p> <p>The act of June'29, 1906 is not unconstitutional as an exercise of judicial power by the legislative branch of the Government, nor is it unconstitutional because retrospective.</p> <p>The ex post facto provision or the Constitution is confined to laws affecting punishment for crime and has no relation to retrospective legislation of any other description.</p> <p>An alien has no legal or moral right to retain citizenship obtained solely by fraud, and an act permitting the cancellation o
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that denaturalization “imposes no punishment upon an alien who has previously procured a certificate of citizenship by fraud or other illegal conduct” but rather “simply deprives him of his ill-gotten privileges”
- explaining that denaturalization “imposes no punishment upon an alien who has previously procured a certificate of citizenship by fraud or other illegal conduct” but rather “simply deprives him of his ill-gotten privileges”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pitney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.