United States v. Navarro

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on United States v. Mechanik, 475 U.S. 66, 73, 106 S.Ct. 938, 89 L.Ed.2d 50 (1986)
• relying on United States v. Mechanik, 475 U.S. 66, 73 (1986)
• “A threat, for purposes of duress, may be express or implied, so long as it is an immediate threat as distinguished from generalized fear.”
• “[I]mproprieties in counsel’s arguments to the jury do not constitute reversible error unless they are so gross as probably to prejudice the defendant, and the prejudice has not been neutralized by the trial judge.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).