· 5/15/1992
United States v. Delores Homick, United States of America v. Charles Dietz
Citations
- 964 F.2d 899
- 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4140
- 92 Daily Journal DAR 6521
- 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 10364
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the interception of \even a relatively high percentage of nonpertinent calls is an inaccurate indicator of whether or not the government complied with the minimization requirement\
- noting that the interception of “even a relatively high percentage of nonpertinent calls is an inaccurate indicator of whether or not the government complied with the minimization requirement”
- the federal wiretap statute does not require the government to exhaust every conceivable alternative before obtaining a wiretap
- reviewing de novo the denial of a Franks hearing
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reinhardt, Noonan, Thompson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.