United States v. Magleby

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting challenge to jury instruction that stated \it does not matter that the defendant may have had more than one motive in performing the act as long as the defendant's race was one of his motives\
• approving an instruction in a § 3631 case that stated, “it does not matter that the defendant may have had more than one motive in performing the act as long as . . . race was one of his motives”
• jury verdict will only be overturned when “no reasonable juror could have reached the disputed verdict”
• the “reaction of the recipient of the alleged threat” is relevant in determining whether a reasonable person would interpret a statement to be a threat
• evidence that the defendant listened to CD with racist lyrics was relevant to establishing that the defendant targeted the victims because of their race
• court properly instructed the jury that they may consider the victims' reactions to the cross burned on their yard in determining the defendant's intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).