Fifth Circuit· 9/25/2007
United States v. Morganfield
Citations
- 501 F.3d 453
- 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 22733
- 2007 WL 2772102
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding convictions under § 1344(2) when defendant made small initial deposits to open checking accounts in names of phony businesses, obtained checks for those accounts, and wrote checks to fictitious employees in amounts exceeding initial deposits
- finding bank had risk of loss when it was presented with a check from an account with insufficient funds because testimony showed the bank might honor the check even when an account had insufficient funds and “[t]hat possibility create[d] a sufficient risk of loss”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Higginbotham, Davis, Barksdale
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. ValenciaFifth Circuit· 2010-03-10· cited 373×
- United States v. MendozaFifth Circuit· 2008-03-26· cited 92×
- United States v. BurnsFifth Circuit· 2008-05-08· cited 91×
- United States v. Sherrie BennettFifth Circuit· 2017-10-16· cited 32×
- United States v. EdelkindFifth Circuit· 2008-04-15· cited 26×
- United States v. Dennis Gray WilliamsEleventh Circuit· 2015-06-22· cited 19×
- United States v. WilliamsTenth Circuit· 2017-08-04· cited 6×
- United States v. JonesSecond Circuit· 2020-07-16· cited 5×
- United States v. SandersFifth Circuit· 2025-03-27· cited 4×
- Brewster v. McNeilS.D. Florida· 2009-06-12· cited 2×
- United States v. SingletonFifth Circuit· 2010-03-10
- United States v. RoenSeventh Circuit· 2013-01-04
Cites
41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court· 1947-06-09· cited 771×
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1982-06-29· cited 389×
- United States v. Martin Gonzalez MunozFifth Circuit· 1998-09-09· cited 308×
- United States v. ParkerFifth Circuit· 1998-01-16· cited 186×
- United States v. David M. Saks, United States of America v. James Doyle SpruillFifth Circuit· 1992-06-23· cited 137×
- United States v. TomblinFifth Circuit· 1994-12-27· cited 128×
- United States v. Terry James Pierre and Otis Harris, IIIFifth Circuit· 1992-04-13· cited 121×
- United States v. Michael A. RileyNinth Circuit· 2003-07-09· cited 118×
- United States v. LankfordFifth Circuit· 1999-12-30· cited 114×
- United States v. David Samuel IrediaFifth Circuit· 1989-03-01· cited 111×
- United States v. Simon Edward Heath and Paul Sau-Ki ChengFifth Circuit· 1992-09-29· cited 110×
- United States v. Gutierrez-FariasFifth Circuit· 2002-06-12· cited 99×
- United States v. Bruce BonnettTenth Circuit· 1989-06-07· cited 99×
- United States v. Luis Enrique InsaulgaratFifth Circuit· 2004-07-19· cited 81×
- United States v. CavinFifth Circuit· 1994-12-02· cited 78×
- United States v. Charleszette Ardel BrandonFourth Circuit· 2002-08-02· cited 69×
- United States v. Bebe Fazia LaljieSecond Circuit· 1999-07-14· cited 62×
- United States v. Boris Granik, Alexander Iskolsky, and Semyon BumaginSecond Circuit· 2004-10-15· cited 53×
- United States v. Susan Carol BriggsFifth Circuit· 1991-08-02· cited 50×
- United States v. Darnell WilliamsFifth Circuit· 1987-08-28· cited 47×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.