United States v. Bruce Bonnett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting argument that witness’ statement to Federal Bureau of Investigation agents was admissible under FRE 801(d)(1)(A) because Castro-Ayon was “not persuasive and . .. clearly distinguishable”
• rejecting argument that witness' statement to Federal Bureau of Investigation agents was admissible under FRE 801(d)(l)(A) because Castro-Ayon was \not persuasive and ... clearly distinguishable\
• “Courts have agreed that a check kiting scheme constitutes a scheme to defraud under the first clause of the statutes, if the mails or interstate wires are employed.”
• party’s stipulation to admissibility of document precluded hearsay objection at trial
• “The closeness in time and the similarity in conduct [are] matters left to the trial court, and [its] decision will not be reversed absent a showing of abuse of discretion.”
• “The closeness in time and the similarity in conduct [are] matters left to the trial court, and [its] decision will not be reversed absent a showing of abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).