United States v. Susan Carol Briggs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying Rule 11(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, upon which section 971.08(1)(b), Stats., was patterned, State v. Bangert, 131 Wis.2d 246, 260-261, 389 N.W.2d 12, 20 (1986)
• applying Rule 11(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, upon which section 971.08(l)(b), Stats., was patterned, State v. Bangert, 131 Wis. 2d 246, 260-261, 389 N.W.2d 12, 20 (1986)
• criminal proceedings may continue against defendant who successfully challenges guilty plea as lacking the factual basis required by Rule 11(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
• criminal proceedings may continue against defendant who successfully challenges guilty plea as lacking the factual basis required by Rule 11(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
• jeopardy with respect to count attaches with acceptance of guilty plea to that count
• “The banks were not even exposed to liability-”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).