Seventh Circuit· 2/4/1994
United States v. Mitchell S. Janik
Citations
- 10 F.3d 470
- 1993 WL 484168
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “In reviewing for substantial evidence, [the court does] not undertake to reweigh conflicting evidence, make credibility determinations, or substitute our judgment for that of the ALJ.”
- there was sufficient evidence to support the defendant’s conviction and no exceptional circumstance.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bauer, Cudahy, Rovner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.