Skip to main content
Seventh Circuit· 2/4/1994

United States v. Mitchell S. Janik

Citations

  • 10 F.3d 470
  • 1993 WL 484168

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In reviewing for substantial evidence, [the court does] not undertake to reweigh conflicting evidence, make credibility determinations, or substitute our judgment for that of the ALJ.”
  • there was sufficient evidence to support the defendant’s conviction and no exceptional circumstance.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Cudahy, Rovner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.