Skip to main content
· 11/19/2004

United States v. Katherine Ann Flowers

Citations

  • 389 F.3d 737
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 24180
  • 2004 WL 2633424

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that district court abused its discretion in expunging court records of woman who pleaded guilty to crime, described her post-conviction accomplishments, and expressed concern that her criminal records would impede her job search
  • stating that “district courts do have jurisdiction to expunge records maintained by the judicial branch”
  • “[C]ourts do have jurisdiction to expunge records maintained by the judicial branch.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cudahy, Ripple, Evans

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.