United States v. James P. Linn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “there appears to be no definitive, all-purpose rule to govern requests of this nature, and to a considerable degree each case must stand on its own two feet”
• noting with apparent approval that “[c]ertain of the cases call for a ‘balancing’ of the equities between the Government’s need to maintain extensive records in order to aid in general law enforcement and the individual’s right of privacy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).