Skip to main content
· 8/30/1978

United States v. Mitchell Edelson, Jr.

Citations

  • 581 F.2d 1290
  • 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 9305

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • unsupported speculation about what disclosure would reveal insufficient to constitute a “particularized need”
  • unsupported speculation about what disclosure would reveal insufficient to constitute a \particularized need\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Pell, Per Curiam, Tone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.