United States v. Joseph A. Chase, United States of America v. Robert H. Parrish, United States of America v. Wyatt J. Roy, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the possibility that a witness' grand jury testimony differed from that given on another occasion is\insufficient reason to 10 pierce the veil of secrecy which protects the proceedings of such a body\
• possibility testimony before grand jury differed from testimony at trial does not show particularized need for grand jury material under Fed. R. Crim. P. 6
• “[O]ne who acts as a government agent and enters into a purported conspiracy in the secret role of an informer cannot be a co-conspirator.” (citing Sears, 343 F.2d 139)
• “the mere possibility that [a witness’s] testimony before a grand jury differed from his testimony at trial, would be insufficient reason to pierce the veil of secrecy that protects the proceedings of such a body”
• trial to the court, no prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).