Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 11/5/1883

United States v. Mitchell

Citations

  • 109 U.S. 146
  • 3 S. Ct. 151
  • 27 L. Ed. 887
  • 1883 U.S. LEXIS 946

Syllabus

<p>Interpreter — Salary—Statute.</p> <p>The Revised Statutes fix the annual salary of an interpreter at four hundred dollars. In 1877 Congress appropriated in gross for such offices “ at three hundred dollars per annum,” and repeated the appropriation inlibeform down to and including the appropriation act of March 3d, 1881. A served as such interpreter from July, 1878, to November, 1883, and was paid at the rate of $300 per annum. In a suit to recover at the rate fixed by the Revised Statutes : Held, that Congress had expressed its purpose to reduce for the .time being the salaries of interpreters, and that the claimant could not recover.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • analyzing the effects of an appropriations act and stating that “[t]he whole question depends on the intention of Congress as expressed in the statutes”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Woods

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.