United States v. Mitchell
Citations
- 109 U.S. 146
- 3 S. Ct. 151
- 27 L. Ed. 887
- 1883 U.S. LEXIS 946
Syllabus
<p>Interpreter — Salary—Statute.</p> <p>The Revised Statutes fix the annual salary of an interpreter at four hundred dollars. In 1877 Congress appropriated in gross for such offices “ at three hundred dollars per annum,” and repeated the appropriation inlibeform down to and including the appropriation act of March 3d, 1881. A served as such interpreter from July, 1878, to November, 1883, and was paid at the rate of $300 per annum. In a suit to recover at the rate fixed by the Revised Statutes : Held, that Congress had expressed its purpose to reduce for the .time being the salaries of interpreters, and that the claimant could not recover.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- analyzing the effects of an appropriations act and stating that “[t]he whole question depends on the intention of Congress as expressed in the statutes”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Woods
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. WillSupreme Court· 1980-12-15· cited 518×
- United States v. DickersonSupreme Court· 1940-06-03· cited 266×
- Maine Community Health Options v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2020-04-27· cited 174×
- Calloway v. District of ColumbiaD.C. Circuit· 2000-06-30· cited 114×
- United States v. LangstonSupreme Court· 1886-05-10· cited 90×
- Moda Health Plan, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2018-06-14· cited 39×
- United States v. VulteSupreme Court· 1914-05-04· cited 37×
- United States v. McGillFifth Circuit· 1996-01-22· cited 36×
- United States v. HarmonSupreme Court· 1893-01-16· cited 34×
- Friends of the Earth v. ArmstrongTenth Circuit· 1973-08-02· cited 34×
- Dennis McHugh v. Robert Rubin, Secretary of the Department of the Treasury, and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and FirearmsSecond Circuit· 2000-07-11· cited 33×
- Belknap v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1893-12-11· cited 27×
- Milford v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1887-02-26· cited 24×
- Louis A. Pontarelli v. United States Department Of The TreasuryThird Circuit· 2002-03-29· cited 23×
- Atlantic Fish Spotters Ass'n v. EvansFirst Circuit· 2003-02-25· cited 22×
- State ex rel. Jones v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court· 1914-02-11· cited 21×
- Jeffreys v. HustonIdaho Supreme Court· 1913-02-11· cited 20×
- Pocono Pines Assembly Hotels Co. v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1932-01-18· cited 18×
- National Labor Relations Board v. Thompson Products, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1944-03-24· cited 17×
- James Michael Mullis v. United StatesSixth Circuit· 2000-10-19· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.