Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 1/16/1893

United States v. Harmon

Citations

  • 147 U.S. 268
  • 13 S. Ct. 327
  • 37 L. Ed. 164
  • 1893 U.S. LEXIS 2162

Syllabus

<p>In a suit brought by a marshal against the United States, under the act of March 3, 1887, c. 35S>, (24 Stat. 505,) to recover $1770.60 as fees and disbursements of the marshal, from March, 1886,-to October, 1888, the items having been disallowed by the First Comptroller: Held, that the Circuit Court of the United States had jurisdiction to review items disallowed by the First Comptroller before March 3, 1887, although, by § 2 of the act, jurisdiction was withheld of claims which had theretofore “.been rejected, or reported on adversely, by any court, department or , commission authorized to hear and determine the same.”</p> <p>Items for marshal’s fees for distributing venires; and for amounts paid for blanks for United States attorney.;' and for amounts charged for marshal’s travel to attend court on days when the courts were held by adjournment over an intervening day, and were not held on consecutive days, and to attend special courts or special terms of court; and for expenses in endeavoring to make an arrest; and for travel to serve precepts, where he had in his hands for service, several precepts against different persons for different causes, and made service of two or more' of such precepts in the course of one trip, making one travel to the most remote point of service, but charging full travel on each precept; and for amounts paid for hack hire in transporting prisoners to and from court; allowed.</p> <p>Whether the payment of the amount of the judgment in favor of the marshal will exceed the maximum compensation of the plaintiff as marshal, and the proper expenses of his office, is a matter still open for adjust* ■ ment at the Treasury Department.</p> <p>The Circuit Court had a fight, under § 15 of the act of 1887; to award certain cost's to the plaintiff, considering the frivolous and vexatious nature ' of the objections taken to the greater part of this claim.</p>

Judges: Blatchford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.