Ninth Circuit· 3/26/1999

United States v. Mitchell

Citations

172 F.3d 1104
99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2205
51 Fed. R. Serv. 408
1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 5221
1999 WL 163147

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that the traditional view is “that evidence of poverty is not admissible to show motive, because it is of slight probative value and would be unfairly prejudicial to poor people charged with crimes”
concluding that evidence of the defendant’s financial condition “produced a high danger of unfair prejudice” because it “portrayed him as a feckless man who did not support his wife and children” (internal quotation marks omitted)
finding that the trial court erred in admitting evidence concerning the defendant’s financial status because the evidence did not show more than the mere fact that the defendant was poor
evidence showed that defendant in Feldman was being “squeezed,” not just that he would be better off with more money
not appropriate to admit evidence that did not show \more than the mere fact that the defendant is poor\
because drug addiction establishes likelihood of desperate need for money “and lack of self-control,” evidence that a person is poor and drug-addicted may be relevant to show motive to commit a crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kleinfeld, Nelson, Wallace

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.