United States v. Brian Edward Ratigan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[i]n order to excuse his procedural default, [petitioner] must show that counsel’s performance was deficient and that the deficient performance prejudiced the defense”
• holding that “[a] § 2255 movant procedurally defaults 25 his claims by not raising them on direct appeal and not showing cause and prejudice or 26 actual innocence in response to the default”
• holding that “[a] § 2255 movant procedurally defaults 15 ||his claims by not raising them on direct appeal and not showing cause and prejudice or 16 actual innocence in response to the default”
• holding that “[a] 21 Section 2255 movant procedurally defaults his claims by not raising them on direct 22 appeal and not showing cause and prejudice or actual innocence in response to the 23 default”
• applying Murray to a sufficiency-of-the-evidence claim raised in a § 2255 petition
• analyzing 10 subject-matter jurisdiction of a criminal case despite procedural default

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).