United States v. Michael Propst

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing petitioner’s failure to obtain proper permitting and finding that petitioner had not established a nonconforming use
• affirming hearing examiner’s finding that applicant failed to establish a nonconforming use because applicant “failed to show that its industrial use of the property was legal at any time”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).