United States v. Corona-Gonzalez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, based on a review of the sentencing transcript, that there was a “substantial chance” that the misapprehension of a fact resulted in a more severe sentence
• finding plain error because judge thrice repeated misstatement that defendant had been deported, and judge deemed that fact important
• remanding because sentence was based on erroneous assumption that defendant had previ‐ ously been deported
• finding plain er- ror because judge thrice repeated misstatement that defend- ant had been deported, and judge deemed that fact im- portant
• finding plain er- ror because judge thrice repeated misstatement that defend- ant had been deported, and judge deemed that fact im- portant
• remanding because sentence was based on erroneous assumption that defendant had previ‐ ously been deported

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).