Skip to main content
· 4/27/2011

United States v. Courtland

Citations

  • 642 F.3d 545
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 8511
  • 2011 WL 1565461

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[P]reserving a claim is ordinarily accomplished by raising the issue in advance of the ruling.”
  • “[P]reserving a claim is ordinarily accomplished by raising the issue in advance of the ruling.”
  • reviewing for abuse of discretion where the “the record [did] not reveal to what extent the defend‐ ants were on notice of the court’s impending filing” of its own sentencing order
  • “There is nothing per se improper about a sentenc‐ ing disparity among co‐conspirators, or even between [two co‐conspirators] to whom a specific departure provision ap‐ plies.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Cudahy, Rovner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.