· 4/27/2011
United States v. Courtland
Citations
- 642 F.3d 545
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 8511
- 2011 WL 1565461
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[P]reserving a claim is ordinarily accomplished by raising the issue in advance of the ruling.”
- “[P]reserving a claim is ordinarily accomplished by raising the issue in advance of the ruling.”
- reviewing for abuse of discretion where the “the record [did] not reveal to what extent the defend‐ ants were on notice of the court’s impending filing” of its own sentencing order
- “There is nothing per se improper about a sentenc‐ ing disparity among co‐conspirators, or even between [two co‐conspirators] to whom a specific departure provision ap‐ plies.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Easterbrook, Cudahy, Rovner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.