United States v. Michael Mohel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant did not claim that he had thought he was selling legal substance, but that he had not participated in any transaction
• \The fact that the [other act] evidence is in the form of statements by the defendant himself does not change the applicable analysis.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).