United States v. Steven Sallins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing “officers generally should be allowed to explain the context in which they act” (citations omitted)
• “An evidentiary error is harmless only if it is highly probable that the improperly admitted evidence did not contribute to the jury’s judgment of conviction.”
• “An evidentiary error is harmless only if it is highly probable that the improperly admitted evidence did not contribute to the jury’s judgment of conviction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).