Skip to main content
· 2/26/2010

United States v. Meux

Citations

  • 597 F.3d 835
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 4026
  • 2010 WL 668899

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • found proper appellate jurisdiction under § 3008 because the district judge entered an order as- signing all post-judgment proceedings to the magistrate judge
  • no prej- udice to defendant after government filed a motion for turnover instead of a motion for garnishment; defendant had “essentially the same due pro- cess protections” that he would have had in garnishment proceedings, in- cluding notice, representation, and a hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Der-Yeghiayan, Posner, Flaum, Deryeghiayan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.