United States v. Kollintzas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the MVRA authorizes use of FDCPA garnishment procedure to enforce restitution order without addressing private party issue
• holding that restitution orders \are effective against every interest in property accorded a taxpayer by state law\
• holding that third party with putative interest in attached funds participates as an “interested person,” not an intervenor, under federal law
• concluding that in supplementary proceeding to discover assets under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, party claiming interest in targeted property may participate without formally intervening
• concluding that in supplementary proceeding to discover assets under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, party claiming interest in targeted property may participate without formally intervening
• concluding that in supplementary proceeding to discover assets under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, party claiming interest in targeted property may participate without formally intervening

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).