Tenth Circuit· 6/8/2018
United States v. Melgar-Cabrera
Citations
- 892 F.3d 1053
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Hobbs Act robbery qualifies as a crime of violence under the elements clause of § 924(c)(3)(A)
- holding that Hobbs Act robbery is categorically a crime of violence under the elements clause of § 924(c)(3)(A)
- holding that Hobbs Act robbery qualifies as a crime of violence under the elements clause of § 924(c)(3)(A)
- holding that Hobbs Act robbery qualifies as a crime of violence under the elements clause of § 924(c)(3)(A)
- holding that Hobbs Act robbery is a crime of violence under § 924(c) based on the elements of the offense
- holding that Hobbs Act robbery qualifies as a crime of violence under the elements clause of § 924(c)(3)(A)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Briscoe, Seymour, McHugh
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. Michael St. HubertEleventh Circuit· 2018-11-15· cited 185×
- United States v. Monico DominguezNinth Circuit· 2020-04-07· cited 103×
- United States v. Garcia-OrtizFirst Circuit· 2018-09-17· cited 101×
- United States v. Marcus WalkerThird Circuit· 2021-03-05· cited 45×
- United States v. BakerTenth Circuit· 2022-09-26· cited 37×
- United States v. Israel PalaciosFourth Circuit· 2020-12-15· cited 27×
- United States v. Nathaniel BowensFifth Circuit· 2018-10-24· cited 25×
- United States v. JeffersonTenth Circuit· 2018-12-28· cited 25×
- In re CannonEleventh Circuit· 2019-07-25· cited 23×
- United States v. George StoneyThird Circuit· 2023-03-10· cited 18×
- United States v. TokiTenth Circuit· 2022-01-31· cited 14×
- Curtis Solomon v. United StatesEleventh Circuit· 2019-01-08· cited 12×
- United States v. Andrew McHaneySeventh Circuit· 2021-06-14· cited 9×
- United States v. JeffersonTenth Circuit· 2021-03-09· cited 7×
- Boulanger v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 2020-10-21· cited 5×
- United States v. SandersFifth Circuit· 2025-03-27· cited 4×
- Loya v. Business Loan Center, Inc. (In Re Loya)W.D. Texas· 2006-09-18· cited 1×
- United States v. MjonessTenth Circuit· 2021-07-13· cited 1×
- United States v. CarterDistrict of Columbia· 2019-10-29
- Beazer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia· 2019-02-06
Cites
44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2013-06-17· cited 5,868×
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2015-06-26· cited 5,137×
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 2002-06-24· cited 4,683×
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2010-03-02· cited 1,738×
- Walton v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1990-08-30· cited 1,614×
- United States v. StevensSupreme Court· 2010-04-20· cited 1,327×
- Gonzales v. Duenas-AlvarezSupreme Court· 2007-01-17· cited 1,029×
- United States v. GonzalesSupreme Court· 1997-03-03· cited 905×
- Beckles v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2017-03-06· cited 748×
- Simpson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1978-02-28· cited 656×
- Irizarry v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2008-06-12· cited 653×
- United States v. CastlemanSupreme Court· 2014-03-26· cited 648×
- Abbott v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2010-11-15· cited 364×
- United States v. MeyersTenth Circuit· 2000-01-04· cited 196×
- United States v. Billie Jerome Allen, United States of America v. Norris G. HolderEighth Circuit· 2001-05-07· cited 181×
- United States v. AtencioTenth Circuit· 2007-01-17· cited 171×
- Jose Ernesto Flores v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesSeventh Circuit· 2003-11-26· cited 142×
- United States v. BerriosThird Circuit· 2012-04-10· cited 137×
- United States v. Perez-VargasTenth Circuit· 2005-07-15· cited 103×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.