Fifth Circuit· 10/24/2018
United States v. Nathaniel Bowens
Citations
- 907 F.3d 347
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “binding circuit precedent forecloses [the] claim that Hobbs Act robbery is not a [crime of violence] predicate under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A)”
- collecting cases rejecting the argument that substantive Hobbs Act robbery is not a crime of violence under § 924(c)
- “As the government correctly notes, binding circuit precedent forecloses Bowens’s claim that Hobbs Act robbery is not a [crime of violence] predicate . . . .”
- approvingly citing these instructions as elements
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Higginbotham, Smith, Graves
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. HillFifth Circuit· 2023-03-22· cited 33×
- Havens v. JamesSecond Circuit· 2023-08-04· cited 28×
- United States v. Darius FieldsFifth Circuit· 2020-10-02· cited 25×
- Xavier Porter v. United StatesSixth Circuit· 2020-05-20· cited 9×
- United States v. Andrew McHaneySeventh Circuit· 2021-06-14· cited 9×
- United States v. HillFifth Circuit· 2022-05-24· cited 5×
- United States v. RogersC.D. California· 2019-06-11· cited 5×
- Terry v. HooperFifth Circuit· 2023-10-31· cited 3×
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1990-05-29· cited 5,461×
- Leocal v. AshcroftSupreme Court· 2004-11-09· cited 1,254×
- Sessions v. DimayaSupreme Court· 2018-04-17· cited 942×
- Rosemond v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2014-03-05· cited 698×
- Standefer v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1980-06-09· cited 693×
- United States v. Brad Eugene Branch, Kevin Whitecliff, Jaime Castillo, Renos Lenny Avraam, Paul Fatta and Graeme Leonard CraddockFifth Circuit· 1996-09-25· cited 186×
- United States v. HillSecond Circuit· 2016-08-03· cited 183×
- In re: Marckson Saint FleurEleventh Circuit· 2016-06-08· cited 138×
- United States v. GoochSixth Circuit· 2017-03-02· cited 112×
- United States v. Melgar-CabreraTenth Circuit· 2018-06-08· cited 112×
- United States v. Arturo M. CampaFirst Circuit· 1982-05-27· cited 94×
- United States v. Steven P. Moser Lavoyd Wayne Dollar Franklin Rollin Johnston Billy Mack O'Neill Jerry Lynn Wilkins Thomas D. GandyFifth Circuit· 1997-10-17· cited 93×
- United States v. Roberto Lopez-Urbina Raul Badillo-RangelFifth Circuit· 2005-08-15· cited 92×
- United States v. Michael AnglinSeventh Circuit· 2017-01-25· cited 74×
- United States v. JenningsFifth Circuit· 1999-11-16· cited 73×
- United States v. Anthony RobinsonThird Circuit· 2016-12-19· cited 68×
- United States v. Jermaine ChapmanFifth Circuit· 2017-03-10· cited 67×
- Norman John Hendrix and Carolyn Sue Torbert v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1964-01-31· cited 64×
- United States v. FloydFifth Circuit· 2003-08-13· cited 63×
- United States v. Darryl HouseEighth Circuit· 2016-06-06· cited 43×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.