Skip to main content
· 6/17/1996

United States v. Medjuck

Citations

  • 937 F. Supp. 1368
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11783
  • 1996 WL 465293

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • surveying legislative history and holding that “Congress did not intend to require United States destination”
  • “The Court is aware that statements of individual judges during an oral argument are not 15 binding in any way.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lynch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.