The Export Group Emilio Figueroa Jack Andrews v. Reef Industries, Inc., and Mexican Coffee Institute

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that statements \not necessary to the decision\ of the case \have no binding or precedential impact\
• holding that statements in a footnote from an earlier decision were dicta in part because no case from that circuit had \cited the contested footnote as binding precedent\
• finding that where we analyzed a section of the statute other than that under which plaintiffs had brought their claims, “these statements were not necessary to the decision and thus have no binding or prece-dential impact”
• rejecting statements not necessary to a prior court’s decision as dicta
• “[T]he existence of subject matter jurisdiction under the FSIA is a question of law subject to de novo review.”
• \statements not necessary to the decision\ reflect dicta and not binding precedent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).