United States v. McKoy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that nervousness during a traffic stop did not permit a finding of reasonable suspicion necessary to conduct a “frisk” of the defendant
• noting that the officer must have a separate particularized, objective basis for “believing that the person is armed and dangerous to the officer or others” to support a protective frisk
• “It is insufficient that the stop itself is valid; there must be a separate analysis of whether the standard for pat-frisks has been met.”
• a traffic violation in a high crime area and a nervous driver insufficient to justify a pat-frisk
• “Nervousness is a common and entirely natural reaction to police presence . . .”
• \Nervousness is a common and entirely natural reaction to police presence ...\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named United States v. McKoy

12 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• United States v. McKoy
  Ninth Circuit· 1996-03-04· cited 19×
• United States v. McKoy
  D. Massachusetts· 2004-12-09· cited 8×
• United States v. McKoy
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1978-04-20· cited 1×
• United States v. McKoy
  Third Circuit· 2009-11-03· cited 1×
• United States v. McKoy
  First Circuit· 2005-12-12
• United States v. McKoy
  D.C. Circuit· 1983-12-15
• United States v. McKoy
  D.C. Circuit· 1986-03-24
• United States v. McKoy
  Eleventh Circuit· 1992-08-18
• United States v. McKoy
  Third Circuit· 2006-06-26
• United States v. McKoy
  Third Circuit· 2006-06-19
• United States v. McKoy
  Third Circuit· 2009-11-03
• United States v. McKoy
  Fourth Circuit· 2011-08-01