First Circuit· 11/1/2005
United States v. McKoy
Citations
- 428 F.3d 38
- 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 23555
- 2005 WL 2850962
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that nervousness during a traffic stop did not permit a finding of reasonable suspicion necessary to conduct a “frisk” of the defendant
- noting that the officer must have a separate particularized, objective basis for “believing that the person is armed and dangerous to the officer or others” to support a protective frisk
- “It is insufficient that the stop itself is valid; there must be a separate analysis of whether the standard for pat-frisks has been met.”
- a traffic violation in a high crime area and a nervous driver insufficient to justify a pat-frisk
- “Nervousness is a common and entirely natural reaction to police presence . . .”
- \Nervousness is a common and entirely natural reaction to police presence ...\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lynch, Campbell, Stahl
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
58 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Ricky A. CaruthersSixth Circuit· 2006-08-11· cited 258×
- Commonwealth v. CruzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2011-04-19· cited 110×
- Estrada v. Rhode IslandFirst Circuit· 2010-02-04· cited 109×
- Huff v. ReichertSeventh Circuit· 2014-03-10· cited 88×
- United States v. Andre WilliamsSeventh Circuit· 2013-09-24· cited 72×
- United States v. Courtney NobleSixth Circuit· 2014-08-08· cited 54×
- United States v. McGregorFirst Circuit· 2011-05-27· cited 53×
- United States v. RobinsonFirst Circuit· 2005-12-23· cited 52×
- United States v. RuidiazFirst Circuit· 2008-06-12· cited 52×
- United States v. TinnieSeventh Circuit· 2011-01-18· cited 45×
- United States v. WrightFirst Circuit· 2009-09-23· cited 43×
- United States v. DionFirst Circuit· 2017-06-08· cited 42×
- United States v. SoaresFirst Circuit· 2008-03-28· cited 41×
- United States v. FordFirst Circuit· 2008-11-05· cited 40×
- Doornbos v. City of ChicagoSeventh Circuit· 2017-08-18· cited 35×
- Commonwealth v. CorderoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2017-06-01· cited 34×
- United States v. Iev, Juvenile MaleNinth Circuit· 2012-11-28· cited 32×
- United States v. Marcelo MonsivaisFifth Circuit· 2017-02-02· cited 31×
- United States v. MouscardyFirst Circuit· 2013-07-15· cited 30×
- United States v. RuidíazFirst Circuit· 2008-06-12· cited 29×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 4,326×
- United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court· 2002-01-15· cited 3,936×
- United States v. RomainFirst Circuit· 2004-12-30· cited 164×
- United States v. Gary Moorefield AKA Maurice GordonThird Circuit· 1997-04-04· cited 128×
- United States v. Dennis G. StanleyFirst Circuit· 1990-10-04· cited 67×
- United States v. SchiavoFirst Circuit· 1994-07-13· cited 63×
- United States v. CruzFirst Circuit· 1998-08-18· cited 62×
- United States v. George E. Lott and Edward TurnerFirst Circuit· 1989-03-28· cited 59×
Other cases named United States v. McKoy
12 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- United States v. McKoyNinth Circuit· 1996-03-04· cited 19×
- United States v. McKoyD. Massachusetts· 2004-12-09· cited 8×
- United States v. McKoyE.D. Pennsylvania· 1978-04-20· cited 1×
- United States v. McKoyThird Circuit· 2009-11-03· cited 1×
- United States v. McKoyFirst Circuit· 2005-12-12
- United States v. McKoyD.C. Circuit· 1983-12-15
- United States v. McKoyD.C. Circuit· 1986-03-24
- United States v. McKoyEleventh Circuit· 1992-08-18
- United States v. McKoyThird Circuit· 2006-06-26
- United States v. McKoyThird Circuit· 2006-06-19
- United States v. McKoyThird Circuit· 2009-11-03
- United States v. McKoyFourth Circuit· 2011-08-01
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.