Seventh Circuit· 3/10/2014
Huff v. Reichert
Citations
- 744 F.3d 999
- 2014 WL 906103
- 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 4446
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the dispute over whether or not the driver changed lanes without a signal was material and denying an officer qualified immunity on the plaintiff’s unreasonable seizure claim where the officer detained the plaintiffs and searched the vehicle
- affirming denial of qualified immunity where there was question of fact whether driver committed multiple illegal lane changes
- explaining that an officer has probable cause “when the facts and circumstances within the officer’s knowledge and of which they have reasonably trust- worthy information are sufficient to warrant a prudent person in believing that the suspect had committed an offense” (cleaned up)
- the Fourth Amendment guarantees citizens the right “ ‘to be secure in their persons ... against unreasonable ... seizures’ of the person.”
- individual’s presence in a high-crime area alone does not support reasonable articulable suspicion
- “[P]robable cause cannot stem only from a suspect’s presence in a high-crime area[.]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bauer, Flaum, Hamilton, Laum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Roric Gibbs v. Brooke LomasSeventh Circuit· 2014-06-17· cited 136×
- Green v. NewportSeventh Circuit· 2017-08-22· cited 98×
- Scott Allin v. City of SpringfieldSeventh Circuit· 2017-01-11· cited 45×
- Doornbos v. City of ChicagoSeventh Circuit· 2017-08-18· cited 35×
- Reuben Garcia v. City of New HopeEighth Circuit· 2021-01-05· cited 27×
- United States v. Kenyon WaltonSeventh Circuit· 2014-08-13· cited 21×
- United States v. LeivaSeventh Circuit· 2016-04-29· cited 12×
- Rouei v. Village of SkokieN.D. Illinois· 2014-07-28· cited 11×
- Moreno v. NapolitanoN.D. Illinois· 2016-09-30· cited 11×
- United States v. Ronald ColbertSeventh Circuit· 2022-11-29· cited 7×
- Mudd v. City of New HavenN.D. Indiana· 2016-07-25· cited 1×
- Arnold v. City of Fort WayneN.D. Indiana· 2016-09-28· cited 1×
- United States v. AmayaN.D. Illinois· 2016-12-16· cited 1×
- Billie Thompson v. Lance CopeSeventh Circuit· 2018-08-14
- Lucinda Lovett v. Landon HerbertSeventh Circuit· 2018-10-29
- Rebolledo v. EdenS.D. Indiana· 2014-03-31
- Daudi Mwangangi v. Taylor NielsenSeventh Circuit· 2022-09-15
- Mark Petersen v. Stefanie PedersenSeventh Circuit· 2025-06-10
- Kiontae Mack v. City of ChicagoSeventh Circuit· 2025-08-13
Cites
50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court· 1982-06-24· cited 22,846×
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court· 2009-01-21· cited 13,928×
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-05-15· cited 7,105×
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court· 1964-11-23· cited 5,133×
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court· 1991-06-20· cited 4,435×
- Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court· 2000-01-19· cited 4,162×
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-02-02· cited 3,856×
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court· 1977-12-05· cited 3,269×
- Johnson v. JonesSupreme Court· 1995-06-12· cited 2,857×
- Behrens v. PelletierSupreme Court· 1996-02-21· cited 2,084×
- Illinois v. CaballesSupreme Court· 2005-01-24· cited 2,007×
- Arizona v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 2009-01-26· cited 1,709×
- Michigan v. ChesternutSupreme Court· 1988-06-13· cited 1,499×
- Barbara Payne v. Michael PauleySeventh Circuit· 2003-07-09· cited 1,341×
- Knowles v. IowaSupreme Court· 1998-12-08· cited 800×
- Anthony Hill v. Daniel M. TangherliniSeventh Circuit· 2013-08-01· cited 454×
- Carmichael v. Village of Palatine, Ill.Seventh Circuit· 2010-05-21· cited 363×
- Williams v. RodriguezSeventh Circuit· 2007-12-06· cited 307×
- United States v. Lenin M. Jerez and Carlos M. SolisSeventh Circuit· 1997-05-19· cited 206×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.