Skip to main content
Seventh Circuit· 3/10/2014

Huff v. Reichert

Citations

  • 744 F.3d 999
  • 2014 WL 906103
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 4446

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the dispute over whether or not the driver changed lanes without a signal was material and denying an officer qualified immunity on the plaintiff’s unreasonable seizure claim where the officer detained the plaintiffs and searched the vehicle
  • affirming denial of qualified immunity where there was question of fact whether driver committed multiple illegal lane changes
  • explaining that an officer has probable cause “when the facts and circumstances within the officer’s knowledge and of which they have reasonably trust- worthy information are sufficient to warrant a prudent person in believing that the suspect had committed an offense” (cleaned up)
  • the Fourth Amendment guarantees citizens the right “ ‘to be secure in their persons ... against unreasonable ... seizures’ of the person.”
  • individual’s presence in a high-crime area alone does not support reasonable articulable suspicion
  • “[P]robable cause cannot stem only from a suspect’s presence in a high-crime area[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Flaum, Hamilton, Laum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.