United States v. Marceau

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no conflict between the lapse of the Act and the Commission’s decision to impose a higher offense level for the possession of an assault weapon by a “prohibited person”
• argument not made in a claimant’s opening brief was deemed waived
• sentencing court may draw plausible inferences from circumstantial evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).