United States v. Martoma

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting documents could “be sealed even given the public access requirements because they contain Defendants’ trade secrets, confidential business information, or information protected by attorney-client privilege”
• noting documents could “be sealed even given the public access requirements because they contain Defendants’ trade secrets, confidential business information, or information protected by attorney-client privilege”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).