Skip to main content
· 3/21/1979

United States v. Frank Viserto, Jr., Richard Rocco, Joseph Solce, Garnet Johnson, Sarah Payne, Howard Williams and Prentiss Covington

Citations

  • 596 F.2d 531
  • 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 16046

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that, although there is a hearsay exception for convictions, there is nothing comparable for acquittals
  • finding express consent to a technical deviation from these procedures to constitute a valid waiver of the defendants' right to challenge this deviation on appeal
  • “[P]roof of the availability of cash by defendants with no legitimate occupation is permitted as tending to show that it was derived from ill-gotten gains.”
  • “Since the alleged duplicitous character of the counts appears on the face of the indictment, appellants could have moved before trial to dismiss the indictment. Fed. R. Crim. P. 12(b)(2). Failure to make the appropriate motion is a waiver.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feinberg, Mulligan, Gurfein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.