Second Circuit· 4/6/1992
United States v. Luis Colon
Citations
- 961 F.2d 41
- 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 6361
- 1992 WL 67179
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that amendments to the Guidelines that constitute a substantive change to, rather than a clarification of, a Guideline do not apply on direct review
- explaining that amendments to the Guidelines that constitute a substantive change to, rather than a clarification of, a Guideline do not apply on direct review
- stating that without more, earlier adverse rulings do not provide a reasonable basis for questioning a judge’s impartiality
- stating that without more, earlier adverse rulings do not provide a reasonable basis for questioning a judge’s impartiality
- finding “same course of conduct” where the defendant stated that he sold 80 glassine envelopes every two or three days for a few years to support his addictions
- explaining that “adverse rulings” alone are not enough
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Newman, Kearse, Cedarbaum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. WackerTenth Circuit· 1995-12-26· cited 358×
- United States v. DiazSecond Circuit· 1999-05-04· cited 292×
- United States v. CapersFourth Circuit· 1995-08-10· cited 150×
- United States of America, Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Charles O. Shonubi, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeSecond Circuit· 1993-06-30· cited 138×
- United States of America, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Howard Broderson, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeSecond Circuit· 1995-10-23· cited 109×
- Harrison v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1999-02-09· cited 99×
- United States v. Kenneth G. MontgomerySeventh Circuit· 1994-01-24· cited 89×
- United States v. Christopher MooreSecond Circuit· 1995-04-25· cited 86×
- United States v. RiverniderSecond Circuit· 2016-07-07· cited 78×
- United States v. Dale M. HendricksonSecond Circuit· 1994-06-13· cited 74×
- United States v. Ephraim LewisSecond Circuit· 1996-08-28· cited 72×
- United States v. Kirk Tang YukSecond Circuit· 2018-03-15· cited 67×
- United States v. Myung Ho Kim, Also Known as RobertoSecond Circuit· 1999-10-08· cited 63×
- Bridges v. Eastman Kodak Co.S.D. New York· 1992-09-01· cited 58×
- United States v. WilsonSecond Circuit· 1993-12-03· cited 56×
- United States v. W. David MarcelloThird Circuit· 1994-01-11· cited 49×
- United States v. ShonubiE.D. New York· 1995-08-04· cited 40×
- United States v. Fernando Caceda, Pablo Rojas-HolguinSecond Circuit· 1993-04-05· cited 39×
- United States v. Juan Rodriguez, Zenon D. RodriguezSecond Circuit· 1993-03-22· cited 38×
- United States v. JesurumSecond Circuit· 2016-04-14· cited 32×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1989-01-18· cited 2,457×
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court· 1974-05-15· cited 1,967×
- Thorpe v. Housing Authority of DurhamSupreme Court· 1969-02-24· cited 1,076×
- United States v. Alvin SantiagoSecond Circuit· 1990-06-22· cited 130×
- United States v. Carlos M. PerdomoSecond Circuit· 1991-03-06· cited 127×
- United States v. Nelson Guerrero, Cesar Rivera and Anthony MedinaSecond Circuit· 1988-12-12· cited 93×
- United States v. Michael ShoulbergSecond Circuit· 1990-02-06· cited 90×
- Irwin A. Schiff v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 1990-11-21· cited 88×
- United States v. George Story and Curtis JonesSecond Circuit· 1989-12-08· cited 72×
- United States of America, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Eduardo Schaper, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeSecond Circuit· 1990-05-16· cited 62×
- United States v. Larry C. HavenerFirst Circuit· 1990-06-05· cited 57×
- United States v. Richard VazzanoSecond Circuit· 1990-06-22· cited 44×
- Aqua-Chem, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court· 1991-06-24· cited 34×
- United States v. Paul Michael MooneyhamNinth Circuit· 1991-07-03· cited 31×
- United States v. Peter ParkFifth Circuit· 1992-01-14· cited 21×
- Litton Systems, Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Second Circuit· 1984-10-16· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.