Skip to main content
· 10/17/1988

United States v. Lee Alexander

Citations

  • 860 F.2d 508
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 14292
  • 1988 WL 109172

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • granting in camera review of Grand Jury minutes and reserving decision on motion to dismiss Indictment
  • granting in camera review of Grand Jury minutes and reserving decision on motion to dismiss Indictment
  • describing RICO conspiratorial conduct as 9 violating the statutory section applicable to the RICO substantive offense, and vice 10 versa
  • denying disclosure of grand jury minutes to court and public, given sketchy justification that testimony needed for sentencing purposes
  • in sentencing “there is no requirement that the court consider only evidence adduced in open court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Van Graafeiland, Kearse, Pollack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.