United States v. Lanham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that whether the defendant “originate[d] the conspiracy . . . is significant in assessing” the degree to which he acted as the conspiracy’s leader
• rejecting a finding of plain error because of a circuit split on the issue
• “To be clearly erroneous, . . . a decision must strike this Court as more than just maybe or probably wrong; it must strike us as wrong with the force of a five-week-old, unrefrigerated dead fish.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).