Skip to main content

Dougherty v. State

Citations

  • 21 A.3d 1
  • 2011 Del. LEXIS 287
  • 2011 WL 2303608

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating counsel presumed effective, and appellant must overcome such presumption by proving prejudice, i.e., reasonable likelihood outcome would have been different but for counsel’s alleged ineffectiveness (citations omitted)
  • reviewing for plain error when appellant did not request a specific jury instruction at trial
  • “Several state and federal courts have concluded that a trial judge does not commit plain error where defense counsel fails to request, and the trial judge does not give sua sponte, a specific unanimity instruction on the overt act requirement of a conspiracy count.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steele, Jacobs, Ridgely

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.