· 11/5/2013
Donavon Huff v. United States
Citations
- 734 F.3d 600
- 2013 WL 5911236
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 22414
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that government did not breach plea agreement by defending district court’s rejection of sentencing adjustment that the -4- Case No. 16-4748, United States v. Bartoli government had agreed to
- observing that it is not necessary to hold an evidentiary hearing where counsel’s alleged defective performance was inconsequential
- concluding the truth of petitioner’s allegations are best tested in an evidentiary hearing
- “A decision not to hold an evidentiary hearing on a motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is reviewed for abuse of discretion.”
- “A decision not to hold an evidentiary hearing on a motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is reviewed for abuse of discretion.”
- “A decision not to hold an evidentiary hearing on a motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is reviewed for abuse of discretion.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McKeague, Donald, Lawson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.