Custer v. Pan American Life Insurance Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \state causes of action asserted [by beneficiaries] against nonfiduciaries are preempted by ERISA\
• holding that “state causes of action asserted [by beneficiaries] against nonfiduciaries are preempted by ERISA”
• recognizing that party’s failure “to respond to a summary judgment motion may leave uncontroverted those facts established by the motion”
• recognizing that party’s failure “to respond to a summary judgment motion may leave uncontroverted those facts established by the motion”
• recognizing that party’s failure “to respond to a summary judgment motion may leave uncontroverted those facts established by the motion”
• holding that when the factual circumstances are undisputed, whether the facts suffice to demonstrate the existence of a plan as defined by ERISA is a question of law to be reviewed de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).