People v. Roderigas
Citations
- 49 Cal. 9
Syllabus
<p>Enticing a Female to a House of Ill-fame.—An indictment for enticing an unmarried female to a house of ill-fame for purposes of prostitution must allege, and the prosecution must prove, on the trial, that such female was of previous chaste character.</p> <p>Idem.—Proof in such case that the female was of previous chaste character need not be made by evidence directly upon the point, but may be shown, prima facie, by presumption from other facts.</p> <p>Seducing a Female.—To seduce a female is not an offense within the meaning of the two hundred and sixty-sixth section of the Penal Code, which makes it a crime to procure any female to have illicit carnal connection with any man. The Act refers to one who procures the gratification of the passion of lewdness in another.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[The Act refers to one] ‘who procures the gratification of the passion of lewdness for another ’ ” (emphasis added)
- “[The Act refers to one] ‘who procures the gratification of the passion of lewdness for another’ ” (emphasis added)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wallace
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. JacoboCalifornia Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2019-07-02· cited 30×
- Ferguson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1894-03-15· cited 25×
- United States v. KrsticNinth Circuit· 2009-03-10· cited 11×
- State v. LockerbySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1892-07-01· cited 11×
- Commonwealth v. WhittakerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1881-04-25· cited 8×
- Harned v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1941-02-18· cited 6×
- Mathews v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1981-05-18· cited 6×
- People v. DixonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2011-01-14· cited 6×
- Miller v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 1905-01-03· cited 6×
- Zabriskie v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1881-11-15· cited 5×
- Pueblo v. MaldonadoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1923-07-26· cited 1×
- People v. JacoboCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2019-07-02
- People v. MaldonadoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1923-07-26
- People v. Pérez PimentelSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1954-11-15
- Pueblo v. Pérez PimentelSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1954-11-15
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.