Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Fourth Circuit· 7/20/2009

United States v. Kingrea

Citations

  • 573 F.3d 186
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 28956
  • 2009 WL 2138973

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the indictment “was insufficient and that the district court’s subsequent jury instructions could not cure this fatal defect”
  • “[W]e agree with [petitioner] that the indictment against him was insufficient and that the district court’s subsequent jury instructions could not cure this fatal defect.”
  • “[T]he act that Congress has determined to be an unlawful act [under § 2156(a)(1)] is the sponsoring of ‘an animal in’ an animal fighting venture, not simply sponsoring a fighting venture.”
  • vacating a conviction because the indictment omitted an essential element

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Williams, Shedd, Agee

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. Kingrea

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.