United States v. John Wayne Cardwell, United States of America v. Leo Hinson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that being handcuffed for two hours in the front seat of a police car does not amount to oppressive conditions
• stating that severances \will be rare\; it is \not enough for the defendant to show that severance offers him a better chance of acquittal\
• requiring \additional facts\ beyond the defendant as a basis for joinder of charges for defendant's participation in a murder-for-hire plot and for defendant's possession of a handgun when arrested for the murder-for-hire plot
• requiring “additional facts” beyond the defendant as a basis for joinder of charges for defendant’s participation in a murder-for-hire plot and for defendant’s possession of a handgun when arrested for the murder-for-hire plot
• requiring “additional facts” beyond the defendant as a basis for joinder of charges for defendant’s participation in a murder-for-hire plot and for defendant’s possession of a handgun when arrested for the murder-for-hire plot
• “[W]e do not believe that a mere temporal relationship is sufficient to show that the two crimes at issue here were logically related.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).