Skip to main content
· 10/24/2005

United States v. Frederick Alonzo Waller

Citations

  • 426 F.3d 838
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 22941
  • 2005 WL 2708784

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant had standing to contest search of bag located inside a friend’s home because he kept secret the bag’s contents and clearly asserted authority over bag
  • holding that a transient person who was never an overnight guest had a reasonable expectation of privacy in a friend's apartment where he showered, changed clothes, and kept some personal possessions
  • holding that defendant had standing to contest search of bag located inside a friend = s home because he kept secret the bag = s contents and clearly asserted authority over bag
  • holding that a defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy at another person’s apartment that he used “primarily for showering, changing clothes, and storing his personal belongings,” including in a bedroom closet
  • noting that failure to make further inquiry was “especially pronounced” when owner was in next room so that inquiry would not have been burdensome
  • reasoning police wouldn’t have opened a suitcase if they thought it belonged to the consenting party because the consenting party wasn’t a suspect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keith, Clay, Farris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.