Skip to main content
Tenth Circuit· 3/9/1995

United States v. Kenneth E. Haddock

Citations

  • 50 F.3d 835
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 4710
  • 1995 WL 100778

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying motion to supplement the record because the proferred materials were “neither necessary nor helpful to the resolution of [the] appeal”
  • “CNB can properly receive the restitution payments since it acquired the claims of the defunct Bank....”
  • error found in restitution order of $76,000; remanded for recalculation of restitution
  • error found in restitution order of $76,000; remanded for recalculation of restitution
  • raising but not deciding the same argument
  • raising but not deciding the same argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Holloway, Downes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.