Skip to main content
· 11/15/2004

United States v. Cheal

Citations

  • 389 F.3d 35
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 23826
  • 2004 WL 2579795

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a defendant's admissions are sufficient to ground the requisite factual basis
  • holding that a defendant’s admissions are sufficient to ground the requisite factual basis
  • recognizing court’s authority to enter restitution order past 90 days
  • recognizing court’s authority to enter restitution order past 90 days
  • construing notice of appeal of conviction and sentence, which included a deferred restitution order, effective to appeal the subsequent amended judgment specifying the amount of restitution
  • finding failure to enter restitution order within ninety days of sentencing did not constitute plain error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Gibson, Lipez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.