Trigueros v. Adams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that proceedings, orders, and filings in other courts, including state courts, are the proper subject of judicial notice when directly related to the case at issue
• holding that the “look through” presumption had been overcome by evidence that 27 the California Supreme Court requested informal briefing on the merits, submission of briefing on 28 the timeliness issue, and the absence of a citation regarding timeliness in the California Supreme 1 Court’s order
• holding presumption rebutted by California Supreme Court’s request and receipt of informal merits briefing
• stating that federal courts “may take notice of proceedings in other courts, both within and without the federal judicial system, if those proceedings have a direct relation to matters at issue”
• stating that federal courts “may take notice of proceedings in other courts, both within and without the federal judicial 26 system, if those proceedings have a direct relation to matters at issue”
• stating that a court “may take [judicial] notice of proceedings in other courts, both within and without the federal judicial system, if those proceedings have a direct relation to matters at issue”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).